Archive for the ‘Writing’ Category

16
Feb

Limping Over The Line

Posted by: Edward Clark

Alright. It’s been a long while since I finished the Ballad of Iron Percy, and I’ve been working on the sequel to that novel ever since. I finished the rough draft of it shortly after the last recorded episode of the original series went live. If you are one of my half-dozen fans, then you’re probably aware that that was a long time ago, and that the work has been in limbo for that entire time.

I can’t really offer anything other than excuses as to why. There were the usual stresses like my job and studies, yes, but there was also a personal tragedy in my life that’s knocked my girlfriend and I out over the last several months. I would love to be able to point to that as the reason for my tardiness, but the truth is that I was way behind schedule before we’d even received the first hint of bad news at home.

Bringing this manuscript to its current draft has been a tortuous nightmare of delays and procrastination. I feel like I have simply not had the time to devote, and that other issues in my life have taken precedence. My writing has suffered as a result, too, because I’ve been unwilling to move onto my next project until I finish this one. I’ve written a couple of shorts in the meantime – some of which I’m actually quite proud of – but these are a poor substitute for the larger projects when it comes to actually chasing my writing goals. I’ve found it impossible to shake the feeling that if I want to be a novelist, then I need to be writing novels. I’ve felt as though I’m losing touch with my dream, and that’s a scary-effing-notion.

But it’s coming close to done. At last, after months of slow work, I’m coming up on the end of this thing. It can finally go to my beta readers, so they can glare at me and ask me what the hell I was thinking while I sputter my thanks and apologies before taking their suggestions on board for another breathtaking round of revision. This should be an exciting time, but right now, I just feel mentally exhausted.

When I finished the Ballad of Iron Percy, I was on the verge of graduating from college. The ceremony wasn’t for another week and a half or so, and I decided that I’d spend that entire time editing. The two-hundred-thousand-word manuscript would be in its first draft by the end of that time, and why not? It wasn’t as if I had anything better to do. And you know what? I fucking did it. Less than two weeks, and I’d taken my godawful mess of a first novel off of the streets, checked it into the YMCA, and cleaned it up until it was just presentable enough for its first interviews. It felt fantastic to print this thing out for the first time – like I was taking a significant step into my own shining future. I just knew that everything would be rainbows, unicorns, and blowjobs going ahead. I knew it, man.

Now, looking back on that ten days of frantic, gleeful effort, I scratch my head and wonder just how in the hell I pulled it off without a fistful of Adderall and an endless well of black coffee. Had I gone through some sort of manic episode? Had I made some kind of Faustian pact this time around? In reality, it was a combination of being incredibly excited to ‘finish,’ being absolutely convinced that editors and agents would fall over themselves to sign me once I got this baby out, and being in a new place with nothing else to do for all that time.

Still, looking back, it seems like a superhuman feat. By contrast, editing this new book felt like trying to escape from Shawshank with nothing but a rock hammer, some pinup girl posters, and some sagely advice delivered by Morgan Freeman. It wasn’t exciting. It was grueling, and it took me several months of on-off chipping away to finish the job. And really, if I’m honest, I’m not even done. This was the first pass. I’ve taken my treasured manuscript out back and hosed him off to get the most obvious dirt off, but I still need to get him a haircut and a new outfit and I don’t even know if the Y has room.

I don’t know why I couldn’t just do what I did for my first book. Maybe I felt a little cynical about it this time, or maybe it’s just harder to summon the gumption when you have to work for a living on top of it. But I do know that something has to change. I’m excited to get back to actual writing and have a new book rattling away in my mind, just itching to get out. I’m thrilled to be able to pass this one to my beta readers, so I can get some real feedback and start making this pile of paragraphs into something resembling an actual novel. But I know I need to come up with a new way to refine my editing process, or I will probably never make it as a proper writer.

There’s a lesson in this somewhere, and I am determined to find it. I need to sit down with a notebook and a pot of coffee – perhaps a bottle of beer or two if it’s late – and figure out some way to fit my dream into the reality of my working life.

15
Jan

Tin Ballerina – On Research

Posted by: Edward Clark

I’ve been working on a new project and am just now far enough into it that I can call it a manuscript. The title I’m working with is ‘Tin Ballerina,’ and I’m really quite excited about it. I think it has a lot of potential, and while the idea behind it is quite complex and difficult to do justice to in a short explanation, I think it will capture the imagination of my audience and lead to awesome things. I haven’t been this excited about writing in several weeks.

But it’s a Science Fiction novel, not a Fantasy novel. There are a number of differences between the genres, of course, but one is of particular concern to me as the author:

In a Fantasy novel like The Ballad of Iron Percy, I can make everything up. In a Science Fiction novel, I need to do research.

In Fantasy, even the laws of physics can be violated with Magic. History, Culture, and the concepts associated with both can be treated like a buffet – take what you want, leave out what you don’t. Nothing is implausible, because your readers suspend their disbelief. It takes a lot more for the story to descend into Lame. In Science Fiction, you actually have to sound like you know what you’re talking about. Your hypothetical future needs to seem somewhat believable according to the real, actual, not bullshit laws of physics and technological development that you’re used to experiencing in the real world. There’s some fudge room, of course. It’s fiction. Only the most determined pedants are going to hit wikipedia every time you introduce a new piece of hypothetical technology. Still, it has to pass clear a mental hurdle of ‘Yeah, that’s plausible enough for me to imagine’ in order for your audience to really get into the book.

You have to convince people who, in general, desperately want to believe you. This is by no means an impossible task, but you do have to try at it.

The book I’m writing features (you guessed it) a Ballerina as the main character, and its setting is a few decades after a near apocalypse in the near future. The world is relatively stable, now, but it’s vastly different from how it was before. There was a virus, and a few nukes did go off as deep, historical tensions boiled over when some nations’ populations were decimated, but that’s all in the past. Mostly. The important part is that the biosphere is relatively intact. So, instead, the Collapse was mostly economic. The world in 2030 (20 years or so before the ‘present day’ of the novel) relies heavily on a globalized economy to meet the needs of the people living in it, so in many places, life’s essentials come from far away. The means of transporting these goods around – liquid fuels – is suddenly disrupted as many OPEC nations are consumed by the Porcelain virus or reduced to nuclear craters, so survivors around the world are forced with the impossible task of trying to meet the demands of their unwieldy populations with what resources can be found or produced locally. In Post-Constitutional America, they have to do this without the aid of a central government, because the President and her administration are all locked away in a bunker beneath the irradiated ruin that was Washington D.C., and they cannot communicate with the outside because they are being actively jammed by the architect of the catastrophe.

This is an oversimplified version of the setting, but you get the general idea: thirty years in the past, a Malthusian wet dream ravaged the world economy and forced survivors to make some really tough decisions. Technology is less advanced than it was in the past almost everywhere , except where pre-Collapse tech has been salvaged and maintained. The institutions and ideas of Constitutional America have been repurposed or disbanded entirely. There’s a lot more to it than that, but I don’t want to give too much away in a blog post. What I’ve mentioned so far should be enough for you to see the avenues of research I’ve got to take. If you’re reading this, perhaps you could suggest other books for me to check out.

First is Ballet. I knew next to nothing about the art last month, and I need to have enough knowledge on the subject to portray a Ballerina convincingly in a novel. Yet as I’m sure you’re able to imagine, Ballet is incredibly complex. It takes a lifetime of study to master. Students begin at a young age and practice constantly in order to get good at it. I picked it as the main character’s profession for a couple of reasons – Ballet is incredibly cool, it’s extremely technical and requires a large amount of patience and dexterity, and it’s completely useless outside of Manhattan in Post-Constitutional America. The character is intelligent and a master of her chosen discipline, but she’s easily thrown out of her element because her area of expertise is so narrow. She looks at almost everything through the Dancer lens. So, I need to have a pretty good idea of what that lens is like. A daunting task.

“That’s okay,” I said to myself. “I’ll just consult Google, then Amazon. I can buy a book or something. It will be easy!” Lawl.

As it turns out, it’s awfully hard to get your hands on a book on Ballet that was not written under the assumption that the reader aspires to be a Ballet Dancer. I certainly don’t fall into that category. I’m not looking for a step-by-step guide to direct my practice or technique, I’m looking for a book that puts the art of Ballet in cultural and historical context for me, that describes the basic techniques and gives me the background information I need to appreciate the art from a more informed point of view. I could not find one of these books while searching on Amazon.

However, while I was on vacation in America, I happened to come across a pair of them while browsing in random bookstores. The first is called Apollo’s Angels, by Jennifer Homans. This provides the cultural and historical backdrop I was looking for. The language is dry and fact-filled, but it’s exactly the sort of source I need to fake a lifetime of Ballet knowledge.

I was also given a more practical book on modern techniques, training, and practices, along with a huge number of stunning pictures. It’s called The Ballet Book, by Nancy Ellison and featuring the American Ballet Theatre, and it’s been a great introduction to the modern art of Ballet. Plus, it doubles as an excellent drawing resource. I haven’t been this stunned at what the human body can do with enough training since I discovered internet porn.

I’ve also had to look at the scientific and economic theories that make up the ’speculative’ part of my fiction here. I haven’t had to get too deep into speculative tech ideas yet, because I’m not at that stage in my novel and any pre-Collapse technology portrayed isn’t going to be too far away from the level of tech we’re at currently. There will be a few layover gadgets that haven’t been invented yet, but they’ll apply principles that already exist.

More immediately, I’ve found that I need a working knowledge of energy technology, the power infrastructure in the US, and a bit of information about where we get the things that we require to sustain our lives and lifestyles. This has led to some interesting (if frightening) reading and research. For instance, in my speculative future, the world’s surviving population loses access to most of its oil reserves.

Fun Fact: The United States consumes roughly 20 million barrels of oil in a day, which is the highest in the world. By a lot… China comes in second place, and we use roughly triple what they do. That’s a pretty conservative estimate, too, but I’m rounding down for the sake of my analysis. America’s proven oil reserves account for 1.5% of the world’s total – most of the world’s oil reserves are in the Middle East, though Canada does have a bunch. Anyway, if Jesus came and threw some miracles around this bitch to extract all of America’s proven oil reserves, you would get something like 21 billion barrels.

Sooo, if we maintained current consumption rates, we’d eat through our own oil supply in less than three years. (21,000,000,000 barrels / 20,000,000 per day is 1050 days, divided by 365 per year is 2.87 years) I don’t know about you, but that scares the shit out of me. It’s good for my concept, though – a sudden severance from abundant energy would have catastrophic results for the surviving population. When gasoline becomes too expensive to be viable, and our network of trucks becomes useless, how will food and other supplies get to population centers like New York? Answer: it won’t. Millions will face starvation if they don’t move as they realize that their location can’t possibly support the huge number of people living there.

Fun Fact Two: America’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve is beefy enough to keep the country running for like 70 days. The SPR is spread across four locations in Texas and Louisiana. So, when the fit hits the shan and the Federal Government gets decapitated in my fictional universe, the Republic of Texas will be a strong regional power. After all, much of their pre-Collapse tech will still work, and they can keep themselves safe by conserving their massive oil stockpile and using it to give themselves a military advantage for a few decades. They will have fuel to keep their tanks and jets running, and it could last a while if they took steps to conserve it.

Anyway, the reading eats into my writing time on occasion, but that’s okay. It’s still forward progress, though it does make me a little antsy to spend my writing time on research because it’s a violation of my Method. So far, so good.

Well, it’s been a while since V and I finished posting the Ballad. It’s an entirely new experience for me. It’s not that I’ve never finished a project before, but rather that I’ve never finished one so large and put it in front of so many potential viewers. I said when I first started out that this was an attempt to reach an audience far larger than I’ve ever tried to hit before, but I don’t think that really hit me until a few days after the book was ‘complete.’ My reaction to it was not exactly what I anticipated.

There was a brief high of achievement. I had a completed audiobook! I’d done it! Work on the Ballad of Iron Percy was over for now.

I was elated. For like two days. It was a huge high, but I suspected that it would eventually end. Indeed, sooner than I expected, I’d sobered up. Thinking about how we finished the job no longer really feels good. Thinking ‘it’s over!’ no longer brings about glee. Instead, I am forced to ask the frightening question which inevitably comes after any declaration of ‘Finished!’ That is, ‘What comes next?’

Next, I cross my fingers and hope the post-complete boost in listeners is enough to sustain a larger ripple in the Podiobooks pond and get me enough attention to the book to sustain interest until we start releasing the second one.

Next, I bask in the praise of those who enjoyed it without reservation.

Next, I weather the criticism of those who have some of it to offer.

After that, I keep going. I finish the sequel’s rough draft and start my third project – a sci-fi novel I’m currently calling ‘Tin Ballerina’ as a working title. I try to find ways to raise interest about the Ballad, get a plan to get the word out, and implement it.

On Praise and Criticism, I can take it. I think. Everybody likes to hear good, nobody likes to hear the bad. Writers are often sensitive and can take criticism pretty personally, and I am no exception to this. It’s only natural to recoil from it and get defensive, even if you know it’s neither helpful nor mature. I’m resolved to learn what I can from any ‘bad’ things people have to say – if I want to become a professional, I’ll probably have to develop a thicker skin. Now’s a good time to start working on that. I do want to know what people think. My greatest fear is not meeting a few misgivings that people have about the script I wrote, but rather meeting empty, apathetic silence.

That’s the easy part, though. All I need to do is endure and learn. The tough part is figuring out how to proceed with the Ballad now that the writing and editing is over. I do indeed have a completed podiobook, and I need to know how to get more people to listen to it. While the Ballad was being released, I had 300-500 listeners working through it at varying paces. This never ceased to amaze me. After all, I was a total unknown to almost all of them, and there are a huge number of titles on Podiobooks to choose from. These were 300 or so people who read my blurb on the site and decided to give it a whirl without knowing anything at all about me, and for whatever reason, they stuck with me for 46 chapters. This mentality is a mystery to me – I’m fairly discriminating with the books I read and will generally choose to invest my time only in novels and authors that come with a recommendation from a trusted friend. I expected other people to do basically the same thing, and so did not expect to get so many listeners right away. It was a pleasant surprise, and I am grateful for every one of them. They were the First Wave.

The Second Wave consists of the folks who subscribed after the book was listed as Complete. Can’t really blame them for waiting – as I said, I’m a total unknown and they didn’t know what to expect from my script. Besides, it’s what I would have done. At this point, some of those folks will have finished, some will still be going at it, and others will have lost interest and dropped it.

I don’t think there will be a Third Wave – not a surge of new listeners, but perhaps a trickle of them if I’m lucky and work to get more. Yet what can I do? Other than word-of-mouth, what can I do to put it out there and pick up new audience members? A serious question. I’m genuinely curious to hear suggestions on the matter, especially from anyone who’s tried it.

At this point, the book and all links to it have fallen off the front page of Podiobooks, so I think it’s unlikely that people will stumble across it on the site at random. For whatever reason, The Ballad of Iron Percy did not make the grade as a staff selection pick, so it’s not going to get a link on the home page again anytime soon. I need to be active in advertising for the book, and I don’t know what works and what doesn’t.

I find the writing easier than the pimping. I don’t think I’m the only one. I’m open to any and all ideas about how to get started. Has anyone tried paid-for ads for their work on Facebook, or on Project Wonderful, something like that? If so, results?

17
Sep

My Method

Posted by: Edward Clark

I had a conversation with a friend of mine about a week ago that amused me. He’s an associate of Veronica’s, and he’s trying to do a zillion things at once – one of which is to start his own comics label. I wish him luck.

Anyway, he knows about The Ballad, and we were talking about my strategy for trying to expose it and eventually sell it. It’s all virgin territory for me, and as he’s trying to do something similar with Incubator Press, both of us had something to gain by swapping notes. Eventually, the topic turned to writing itself. He knows I’ve written a novel and I think he plans to do one himself, but he’s having difficulty starting. So, we talked for a little while about my method. His comment on it after I explained it to him made me laugh. He said:

<paraphrase>

“Wow. Don’t take this the wrong way, dude, but I wouldn’t have thought that this approach could successfully produce a novel.”

</paraphrase>

There are a number of methods people will use to write. Some people are super organized about it – they plan everything before they do anything, thinking about the plot and writing out pages and pages of detailed outlines before they actually begin work. They know what scenes will happen and when, and they’ve got it all on paper. They can even write scenes out of order and assemble them like puzzle pieces into a contiguous whole after all of them are done.

That seems almost superhuman to me. It’s so far removed from my own method that I can barely relate to it. But hey, whatever works, right? I can’t really argue with it if it gets the job done. This is how I used to write collaborative fiction when I was still into that – we’d plot out the scenes and decide who would write which ones, and then we’d get on with it.

But this is not how I do things when I’m working by myself. My method is a whole lot messier. Here are my steps:

1: Start at the beginning.

It’s my experience that if I’ve got an idea for a novel, and it’s a good one, then I obsess over it in the beginning. I turn it over and inspect all its sides in my imagination. Before I put pen to page, I have an idea for an opening scene for the work and a general direction for the plot. I find that beginning. I fire up Word. And then I start writing.

2: Fuck Outlines. Just Go.

I don’t think that outlining counts as writing. I do use outlines as a tool – they can be really valuable for a sense of perspective in something as long as a novel. I just don’t bother with them in the beginning because I find it simpler and better to just start writing.

I do take notes, however. This is especially valuable for the Fantasy genre because you end up inventing a lot of things from scratch, and it can be hard to keep track of everything. I write down the names of new characters with a one or two sentence description as they come into the narrative. I do the same for other abstract concepts – religions, factions, rules of magic, place names, etc. I do this as I go along, while I’m writing. This is to prevent me from having to root through all the dreck I wrote looking for a single sentence that gives me the name of a person I introduced months ago. I don’t trust my own memory. I can’t rely on remembering the names of every minor character I’ve ever introduced months down the line, so I write things down. But I don’t do it at the beginning, because I can’t shake the feeling that that’s wasted time and effort.

One of the reasons that I don’t use comprehensive outlines at the beginning of the process is that in something as long as a novel, I can always count on getting taken by surprise by a plot twist or two that I never expected going in. I don’t outline going in because it makes me feel too attached to one specific plot track, and I know that sometimes, my characters like to trailblaze. I’m better able to adapt to this if I haven’t spent hours putting together an outline first.

Instead? Just Go, baby. Start at the beginning and wing it. Keep writing until you’re done. It’s that simple.

3: … ‘Keep Writing?’

That you can knock a brick wall down by banging your head against it repeatedly is probably one of the most important ideas that has ever taken root in my mind.

I’m convinced that capital-C Commitment is what separates an Author from the untold legions of Wannabes. It’s not enough to be creative and have ideas. You have to write. And if you want to write a book, then you have to write a lot. It takes a very long time in front of the keyboard to finish everything. There’s no shortcut to this. You have to keep writing long after the muse is gone, because you can’t count on that chick sticking around long enough for you to finish the job.

When I was writing the Ballad, I stuck to quotas. I wrote at least 1500 words a day, every day. If I felt like going beyond that, then I would. If I didn’t feel like hitting it, then I’d sit my ass down in front of the monitor and just do it, damn it, even if I had to stay up into the wee hours of the morning. Or I’d fail. I’d go to sleep with my 700 words, wake up, and try again the next day.

Quotas are not a new idea. I took it straight from NaNoWriMo, set a higher bar, and extended it over several months. Forgetting the Outline isn’t a new idea, either – I got it from Stephen King’s method, and have been using it for all of my fiction since I first read On Writing in high school. It works quite well for me. Your mileage may vary.

Sometimes it felt like trying to get blood from the stone. It would take ages to do a few hundred words. Other times, it would come easily. I’d slip into the story and tap out 2000 words without even trying. I learned a bunch of little tricks to maximize my writing productivity (travel, use the Magic Pre-Coffee Morning Hours wisely, etc.), but I couldn’t rely on them completely. The important thing was to get on with it and write a lot every single day. On each individual day, I rarely feel like I accomplished much. But after a month, I look back on all I did and grin. 30,000 words is a significant chunk of a novel.

I can’t do the same thing, now. I wrote the Ballad in college and could think nothing of staying up until 3:00 AM writing. Though I absolutely love doing that, I can’t anymore. I have a job and a relationship, and I can’t neglect either.

But I still write every single day. And I still shoot for 1500, even though I don’t  always hit it.

3b: Drink Coffee.

The amount of coffee I drink over the course of writing out an entire manuscript can only be estimated accurately if I use bathtubs as my unit of measurement. If you don’t drink coffee, now it’s time to start.

One of us… one of us…

4: Sit on it.

This next step is of critical importance. I have to do absolutely nothing – nothing related to this project, anyway. I use this time to take a break, write a few shorts, or start another project. I need to get the story that I’ve just written completely out of my mind. This can be really hard, because when I’m done with the rough draft, I’m usually quite pumped to start editing, finish the job, and pass it out to my alpha/beta readers. But it’s necessary – I ignore this step at my own peril.

I do this because it’s easier to be objective and follow the logic of the story as it is on the page if my idealized concept of ‘how it’s supposed to be’ is diluted in my mind. Letting the rough draft sit for a while allows me to get a better answer to an often difficult question – that is, “What the fuck was I thinking?”

I need to be able to look at my work from a reader’s perspective, not as the author.

If I begin to edit immediately, my reading is influenced by what I was thinking when I wrote it. But if I sit on the project for a little while, then I forget my reasoning. I have to reacquire it based on what’s on the page. If there’s a gap somewhere or a flaw in my logic – and there are always a few things that need tuning up – it’s easier for me to spot. This makes the whole editing process a lot more smooth and efficient.

5: Edit!

I have a completed manuscript and I finished it several weeks ago. I’ve successfully resisted the urge to touch it in all those weeks, and am just now thinking about how I’m going to edit it.

So, I open her up.

On the first pass, I clean up obvious errors and writing mistakes. I get rid of unnecessary adverbs, remove and replace repeated words where I find them, and rewrite bad sentences. I also write down each scene in the order it appears, with a brief description.

When I’m done with this, the manuscript is already beginning to look a lot more refined. A single pass improves things dramatically. It also leaves me with a list of the scenes and the order in which they appear, and a big-picture portrayal of the plot – an Outline, in other words. I use this to divide my list of scenes into chapters. I also decide what’s missing and what, if anything, does not fit and should be taken out. I write up these new scenes, give them a lookover, and insert them into the manuscript. I delete anything that needs deleting. I add the chapter breaks where I’ve decided they belong, and I redo these divisions when I find that I’ve made some too short and some too long.

The third pass involves formatting. I double-space the whole manuscript, eliminate the line breaks between paragraphs, and indent at the beginning of each new paragraph. While I’m doing this, I idly scan for more repeated words and other mistakes – I probably caught most of these in the first pass, but given the size of the manuscript, it’s likely that some slipped past me. I’ll catch a few while I’m formatting. Even this time, however, I’ll be left with some errors. But unless I want to do yet another pass, I’ll leave these to my beta readers.

6: Distribute.

At this stage, I pass it to my alpha reader – Becki, my partner. This is the single toughest part of the process, because it involves putting my self esteem in the hands of another. She’s gentle with it, of course, but it’s still a nerve-wracking process. She reads and gives me her first impression, takes extensive notes and provides me with page-number references to her observations. She looks for continuity errors in the story as well as more basic errors in writing – anything I might have missed in the first and third passes. She also looks at the narrative critically and tells me what works and doesn’t work, what she feels is missing, and what she thinks I could change.

Here, I look at her notes and make the most obvious changes. I look for all the basic stuff and zap it right away. The suggestions about plot or story require a judgment call on my part. I’ll look at them individually and decide what, if anything, I’m going to do about each one, and then I take the appropriate action.

Once I’m done making changes to that manuscript, it is in its second draft. This is a mostly finished state. It’s almost completely free of errors, aside from a handful that have managed to elude multiple dragnets. The plot is solid and has passed continuity checks, and it has been evaluated and okay’d by a person who is not me.

Now, I bring in the beta readers. I have a small and important list of people who are willing to read my scribblings and provide detailed feedback that I can use to further refine it. These people are incredibly precious to me. It’s not hard for me to get readers, but they usually give me a reply email like ‘it was good, and I liked it,’ which is not very helpful. A rare few of them go above and beyond the call of duty. They give me detailed comments on specific parts of the narrative that let me make positive changes to it. I take this feedback and I think on it, making the alterations that I deem appropriate.

And then I’m done. It’s in its third (and final) draft. Break out the bubbly!

Drawbacks:

My method is flexible in that it doesn’t tie me to specific plot devices. This is nice for the Big Picture of the narrative, but it has a few major drawbacks that are worth noting. It’s a very wasteful writing method. I end up deleting whole scenes because they turn out not to fit in the final piece. I waste an awful lot of work. Days of it, in fact. I feel like I could mitigate this if I were a bit more structured from the getgo.

But I also feel that having absolute plot flexibility makes this worthwhile.

It’s also worth noting that this messy method is vulnerable to continuity errors. Minor details can have trouble staying consistent across the whole manuscript, and it’s very hard to catch each inconsistency across 600+ pages. For instance, in the Ballad of Iron Percy, I have a pair of characters (Jared and Elise Aranoun) that are siblings. They are roughly the same age, but they aren’t twins. One of them has to be older than the other, obviously, but this little detail is not that important to the story. I never wrote it down when I recorded the descriptions of these characters. So, which sibling is the elder was inconsistent throughout the first versions of the manuscript. It proved a serious annoyance to iron this out throughout the manuscript, and it wouldn’t even be an issue if I’d taken the trouble to be more detailed and explicit with character notes. Writers who make in-depth outlines before they start probably don’t have this problem.

When I start a new series with a new world, I’m going to try being more detailed with my character notes as I introduce new ones to the story. I’ll see if that mitigates it. Otherwise, the only remedy is a painstaking examination of the text after the fact.

I am constantly refining and reexamining my method. I probably always will be.

19
Aug

Veronica Giguere’s “Keepers”

Posted by: Edward Clark

My voice actress is also a writer.

I knew this, of course – that’s how we met in the first place. Still, I find it necessary to point this out to the probably-imaginary readers of my blog. She recently put out a story on SmashWords called ‘Keepers’ to help generate a little bit of cash for a mutual friend of ours, who is trying to start up a small publishing company. I like these people, I like what they’re trying to do, V is a decent writer, and the story was only two dollars. So, of course I bought it.

Read the rest of this entry »

12
Aug

City of Heroes: Going Rogue

Posted by: Edward Clark

If you’re reading this post, it must be because City of Heroes: Going Rogue has just had its NDA lifted. Now we can talk about Fight Club Going Rogue.

I’ve been a City of Heroes player for more than 72 months. I love that game, even after all this time. If by some chance you are a listener to the Ballad of Iron Percy and also play City of Heroes, feel free to send me a tell and say hello. My global is @Hegemon, and I play on the Pinnacle and Virtue servers.

Naturally, I preordered Going Rogue. I have been in the beta for a long while, now, and have some pretty well developed opinions on just about everything to do with the expansion. I’m going to take the time to share them here in this post.

If this subject is of no interest to you, then you should probably skip it unless you’re really, really bored.

Enough prelude. Let’s get right in there.

Read the rest of this entry »

8
Aug

Cool > Real?

Posted by: Edward Clark

As a writer of fantasy novels, I think that Cool > Real much of the time. I came to this conclusion fairly early writing the Ballad. Specifically, I was writing my first swordfighting scene with Graham and Captain Ferdinand. I had it in my head that I would write ‘realistic’ sword fights. At the time, I knew absolutely nothing about rapiers, sabers, or how to handle them, but that didn’t deter me. I’d do research! I’d learn what I needed to know, watch videos of expert fencers, read up on technique… I would equip myself with just enough knowledge to describe what was happening really, really well and still have it qualify as Realistic.

Cheerful and smug, I started to investigate. I read a few articles about the weapons. I fired up YouTube and watched a few fencing matches between experts.

Read the rest of this entry »

22
Jul

The Siren Song of New Stuff

Posted by: Edward Clark

I’m a little inexperienced to actually start giving out advice to newer authors. I haven’t been properly published, after all, so I appreciate that anything I have to say about being a successful writer is, being generous to myself, highly speculative.

But I have cleared a rather important step along the way. I have successfully completed a manuscript. I feel that this counts for something – not a lot, mind, but something. It is a hurdle that many would-be writers find difficult to clear. I know this because I have been there, charted that territory, and have successfully climbed the mountain. It was hard. If you’ve ever tried it, then you know. I know where many of the hazards are. I have also taken a lot of useful (and not so useful) advice throughout the process.

I was forced to re-learn one of these important lessons recently: Beware the Siren Song of New Stuff!

Read the rest of this entry »

11
Jun

Dropbox: how did I get by before I had this?

Posted by: Edward Clark

You ever come across a piece of technology that instantly changes the way you operate? Then, even if it’s just a week or two later, you wonder how you ever did things before you found it? This recently happened to me.

Read the rest of this entry »

8
Jun

The Sexy Bits

Posted by: Edward Clark

Writers take varied approaches to sex scenes in their work. These range from ‘avoid them entirely – not even the slightest whiff of innuendo’ to ‘blow-by-blow descriptions of every step from glint-in-eye to steamy finish, with scenes that span several pages if necessary, complete with labelled illustrations and diagrams as well as a helpful Glossary in the appendix section to help readers fully understand what’s going on.’

I have no problem with sex scenes in fiction. I often find them quite enjoyable in other authors’ work, and include them in my own when they’re appropriate. The Ballad of Iron Percy features a few sexual encounters, for example. It would be relatively impossible to write a book narrated by a Succubus without a few risqué moments. The tricky part is keeping them tasteful, appropriate, and interesting.

Read the rest of this entry »